ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2025
Comparison of the long-term outcome of home vs. inpatient treatment: 18-24 months follow-up of a non-randomized controlled trial.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of home treatment and inpatient treatment for children and adolescents in psychiatric crisis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Cost Burden, Readmission Dynamics, and Service Management in Psychiatric Care: A Financial Performance Analysis in a Romanian Public Hospital.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cost-utility analysis of home treatment versus inpatient treatment in child and adolescent psychiatry: a decision analysis.Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Home Treatment (HT) in child and adolescent psychiatry is an increasingly important topic in the current context of global crises and strained mental health systems. We implemented a HT program provided by a multiprofessional treatment team and compared long-term outcomes of 27 patients (48% female, Ø15.15 ± 2.77 years) with those of 48 patients (69% female, Ø16.35 ± 2.87 years) who received inpatient treatment as usual (I-TAU). Psychopathology was assessed using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA[-SR]) and psychosocial functioning was assessed using the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) at admission, discharge, and 18-24 months after discharge. Treatment outcomes were analyzed using mixed models. The results showed that patients in the HT arm had significantly lower HoNOSCA scores at follow-up (β = -4.25 [95%CI: -7.64 to -0.86], SE = 1.73, p = 0.014) and higher GAF scores (β = 12.09 [95%CI: 4.48 to 19.70], SE = 3.88, p = 0.002) compared to those in the I-TAU arm. No significant differences were observed in HoNOSCA-SR scores (β = -2.46 [95%CI: -9.16 to 4.30], SE = 3.43, p = 0.48) and readmission rates (OR = 1.23 [95%CI = 0.47 to 3.20], p = 0.67). These results highlight the potential of HT in improving long-term functional and psychopathological outcomes in youth mental health. HT may be an equally effective and even more sustainable type of treatment for child and adolescent mental disorders. The trial was preregistered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00025424, 05/27/2021).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.