ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026
A multimodal approach to depression diagnosis: insights from machine learning algorithm development in primary care.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond inflammatory markers: immunometabolic phenotypes for precision stratification in psychiatry.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
- A novel approach to depression detection using POV glasses and machine learning for multimodal analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
General practitioners play an essential role in identifying depression and are often the first point of contact for patients. Current diagnostic tools, such as the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, provide initial screening but might lead to false positives. To address this, we developed a two-step machine learning model called Clinical 15, trained on a cohort of 581 participants using a nested cross-validation framework. The model integrates self-reported data from validated questionnaires within a study sample of patients presenting to general practitioners. Clinical 15 demonstrated a balanced accuracy of 88.2% and incorporates a traffic light system: green for healthy, red for depression, and yellow for uncertain cases. Gaussian mixture model clustering identified four depression subtypes, including an Immuno-Metabolic cluster characterized by obesity, low-grade inflammation, autonomic nervous system dysregulation, and reduced physical activity. The Clinical 15 algorithm identified all patients within the immuno-metabolic cluster as depressed, although 22.2% (30.8% across the whole dataset) were categorized as uncertain, leading to a yellow traffic light. The biological characterization of patients and monitoring of their clinical course may be used for differential risk stratification in the future. In conclusion, the Clinical 15 model provides a highly sensitive and specific tool to support GPs in diagnosing depression. Future algorithm improvements may integrate further biological markers and longitudinal data. The tool's clinical utility needs further evaluation through a randomized controlled trial, which is currently being planned. Additionally, assessing whether GPs actively integrate the algorithm's predictions into their diagnostic and treatment decisions will be critical for its practical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.