Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40063236›Full record

ArticleInfection2025

Antibiotic resistance of urinary pathogens after kidney transplantation: a 10-year single-center survey in Germany.

P Weber, P Braß, J Jäger, L Jacquet, S Jansen, A Gäckler, C Jürgens, J Reinold, U Eisenberger, P-M Rath and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Urinary tract infections in immunocompromised patients.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  6. Early Onset Bacteremia in Kidney Transplant Recipients in the Current Era.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

P WeberDepartment of Infectious Diseases, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. peter.weber@uk-essen.de.
P BraßDepartment of Infectious Diseases, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
J JägerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
L JacquetDepartment of Infectious Diseases, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
S JansenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
A GäcklerDepartment of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
C JürgensDepartment of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
J ReinoldDepartment of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
U EisenbergerDepartment of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany.
P-M RathInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
A KribbenDepartment of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
O WitzkeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
H RohnDepartment of Infectious Diseases, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUrinary tract infections (UTIs) are common complications after kidney transplantation (KT), often resulting in severe outcomes like acute graft failure and sepsis. Factors such as diabetes, age, sex, and type of transplantation significantly influence disease progression. Rising antibiotic resistance complicates treatment, emphasizing the importance of Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS), particularly during the post-transplant immunosuppression phase. Recent changes in treatment protocols, including a shift away from treating asymptomatic bacteriuria and modifications in antibiotic prescribing, highlight the need for updated resistance trend analyses.

methodsThis retrospective study at the University Hospital Essen analyzed urine samples from kidney transplant outpatients from 2013 to 2022. Pathogen identification and resistance testing focused on common UTI pathogens, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecium, and Enterococcus faecalis. Data on antibiotic prescriptions were sourced from the North Rhine Association of Statutory Health Insurance since 2017.

resultsOut of 10,508 urine samples collected from 6962 patients, bacterial growth was detected in 4126 samples (39%). Escherichia (E.) coli was the most frequent pathogen (41%). Klebsiella spp., which accounted for 11.7% of all pathogens, showed increasing resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftazidime. Resistance rates Enterococcus faecalis showing a significant decline in levofloxacin (100% resistance in 2014 in all isolates, compared to 2% in 2022). An increasing concern in our cohort is the prevalence of Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL)-producing Gram-negative pathogens, particularly Klebsiella spp., which are being detected with greater frequency. In our center, we have observed a significant increase in the use of oral antibiotics recommended for first-line therapy. This shift is attributed to updated guidelines and therapeutic recommendations. Consequently, oral cephalosporins are now rarely used due to their low bioavailability.

conclusionThe study highlights the importance of ongoing surveillance to address antibiotic resistance in KT recipients. Increasing resistance in pathogens like Klebsiella spp. necessitates new antimicrobial strategies. Findings should inform future guidelines to preserve antibiotic effectiveness and improve therapeutic outcomes in this vulnerable patient population.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaDrug Resistance, BacterialKidney TransplantationUrinary Tract InfectionsAdultAgedFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic resistanceAntimicrobial stewardshipKidney transplantationUrinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID40063236
PMCPMC12460382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.