ArticleEJNMMI physics2025
Myocardial perfusion imaging SPECT left ventricle segmentation with graphs.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeVarious specialized and general collimators are used for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to assess different types of coronary artery disease (CAD). Alongside the wide variability in imaging characteristics, the apriori "learnt" information of left ventricular (LV) shape can affect the final diagnosis of the imaging protocol. This study evaluates the effect of prior information incorporation into the segmentation process, compared to deep learning (DL) approaches, as well as the differences of 4 collimation techniques on 5 different datasets.
methodsThis study was implemented on 80 patients database. 40 patients were coming from mixed black-box collimators, 10 each, from multi-pinhole (MPH), low energy high resolution (LEHR), CardioC and CardioD collimators. The testing was evaluated on a new continuous graph-based approach, which automatically segments the left ventricular volume with prior information on the cardiac geometry. The technique is based on the continuous max-flow (CMF) min-cut algorithm, which performance was evaluated in precision, recall, IoU and Dice score metrics.
resultsIn the testing it was shown that, the developed method showed a good improvement over deep learning reaching higher scores in most of the evaluation metrics. Further investigating the different collimation techniques, the evaluation of receiver operating characterstic (ROC) curves showed different stabilities on the various collimators. Running Wilcoxon signed-rank test on the outlines of the LVs showed differentiability between the collimation procedures. To further investigate these phenomena the model parameters of the LVs were reconstructed and evaluated by the uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) method, which further proved that collimators can be differentiated based on the projected LV shapes alone.
conclusionsThe results show that prior information incorporation can enhance the performance of segmentation methods and collimation strategies have a high effect on the projected cardiac geometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.