Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40063211›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

The role of individual differences and attitude in willingness to participate in TMS studies.

C Lolansen, C J Howard, S Mitra, S P Badham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C LolansenSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park Campus, East Dr, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. cecilie.lolansen@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0009-0007-6904-983X
C J HowardDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG1 4BU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8755-1109
S MitraDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG1 4BU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7620-4809
S P BadhamDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG1 4BU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6890-102X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Finding neurophysiological research participants can be challenging, especially when the technology used in the research study is less known, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Despite this well-known phenomenon, there is limited literature investigating the factors involved in willingness to participate and perceived barriers from the potential participants' perspective. This paper explored the relationship between individual differences, attitudes toward TMS, and willingness to participate in TMS research alongside perceived barriers to participation and concerns when considering participating. The findings suggest that participants who had more positive attitudes towards TMS were more willing to participate. Participants frequently reported being concerned about safety, including risks and side effects. For barriers in terms of safety parameters, the number of participants who were eligible based on their TMS safety screening questionnaire was low, particularly for older adults. These findings are discussed in the context of the literature, and practical guidelines are provided for researchers looking to plan TMS recruitment.

Indexed as

AttitudeIndividualityTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAgeingBarriers to ParticipationEligibilityParticipant RecruitmentTranscranial magnetic stimulation/TMS

Identifiers

PMID40063211
PMCPMC11893711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.