ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025
Reliability of spectral Doppler in handheld ultrasonographic device.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To verify and validate the reliability of diastolic function parameters and valvular flow velocities acquired during the handheld ultrasound device (HUD) echocardiographic examination. Study population consisted of the consecutive patients referred for consultation due to dyspnea or impaired exercise tolerance. All patients underwent brief bedside echocardiographic screening with HUD. Within the next 24 h all patients underwent full echocardiographic examination (treated as reference). 105 patients (58 men, mean age 65 ± 14 years) were enrolled in the study. All correlations of HUD and standard echo derived measurements were high or very high. Bland-Altman plot analysis revealed the underestimation bias for mitral inflow velocities- early (E) and late (A), ), mitral annular peak early diastolic velocity (e') was not burdened with bias. The agreement between the major HFA-PEFF score parameters showed either substantial or almost perfect agreement, minor parameter- moderate agreement. The correlation of the measurements of maximum mitral velocity was high with no clinically relevant bias. Kappa coefficient showed very good agreement between HUD and reference echocardiography for detecting accelerated blood flow through the mitral valve (Kappa coefficient 0.83). The assessment of the aortic valve showed a very good correlation, with a slight underestimation bias of -0.17 m/sec (P <.001). Kappa coefficient showed good agreement between HUD and reference echocardiography for detecting accelerated blood flow (Kappa coefficient 0.74). HUD equipped with pulse and continuous wave Doppler modality enables reliable measurements of the parameters used during the left ventricle diastolic function assessment. Similarly, aortic and mitral peak jet velocities can be accurately measured using the mentioned devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40063157What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.