Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40063141›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025

A standardized protocol for robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: improving efficiency and reducing costs.

Hidehiko Kitagami, Saseem Poudel, Yosuke Kitayama, Junkichi Koinuma, Yuma Ebihara, Satoshi Hirano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hidehiko KitagamiRobotic and Endoscopic Surgical Center, Keiyukai Sapporo Hospital, Hondori 9 Chome Minami 1-1, Shiroishi Ward, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. kitagami@phoenix-c.or.jp.
Saseem PoudelRobotic and Endoscopic Surgical Center, Keiyukai Sapporo Hospital, Hondori 9 Chome Minami 1-1, Shiroishi Ward, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Yosuke KitayamaRobotic and Endoscopic Surgical Center, Keiyukai Sapporo Hospital, Hondori 9 Chome Minami 1-1, Shiroishi Ward, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Junkichi KoinumaRobotic and Endoscopic Surgical Center, Keiyukai Sapporo Hospital, Hondori 9 Chome Minami 1-1, Shiroishi Ward, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Yuma EbiharaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Satoshi HiranoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) has shown potential benefits over conventional procedures for esophageal cancer. However, uniform surgical protocols are lacking, leading to variability in outcomes and increased costs. This retrospective study included 180 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent RAMIE between May 2018 and September 2024. A standardized approach, termed counterclockwise partitioned mediastinal dissection (CPMD), was introduced in 114 of these cases. Perioperative parameters including operative time, blood loss, complications, and cost of disposable instruments, were compared between patients treated before and after protocol standardization. Among the 114 patients who received the standardized RAMIE protocol, the median thoracic console time significantly decreased to 148 min, with overall blood loss reduced to 62 ml. No conversions to open surgery were required in either cohort. Compared to the pre-standardization group, postoperative complications-including recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis-were lower and only one patient needed reoperation. Importantly, reusing robotic instruments from the thoracic phase in the abdominal phase reduced disposable instrument costs, resulting in a savings of approximately 168,000 Japanese Yen (USD 1050) per case. Implementing a standardized RAMIE protocol enhances procedural efficiency, reduces blood loss, and lowers costs without compromising surgical or oncological outcomes. This approach may facilitate broader adoption of RAMIE as a safe and cost-effective strategy for esophageal cancer surgery.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesCost-effectivenessEsophageal cancerMediastinal dissectionRobot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE)StandardizationSurgical technique

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.