Trial reportLasers in medical science2025
Influence of irradiance on photobiomodulation therapy for muscle performance in healthy individuals in a strength training program for lower limbs. A double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This investigation attempts to elucidate power density's interplay with observed outcomes subsequent to a training regimen. Forty-two participants were stratified into three groups (Sham, Cluster, LED-Blanket), with irradiated groups receiving 300 J of energy under distinct parameters. Photobiomodulation irradiation was applied to the quadriceps and hamstrings before each of the ten prescribed training sessions, which consisted of three sets of stiff and squats. Participants underwent assessment during sessions, encompassing blood lactate measurements and psychophysiological scales (Numerical Rating Pain Scale for Pain and Rate of Perceived Effort). Additionally, pre-intervention, post-intervention, and follow-up evaluations on an isokinetic dynamometer measured peak torque. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA for intra- and inter-group comparisons. No significant inter-group differences or group-time interactions were discerned in lactate concentration or psychophysiological indices. Solely, a difference surfaced in the peak torque of the dominant limb during knee flexion, manifesting across pre-, post, and follow-up intervals (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001) with an effect size of n
Indexed as
Identifiers
40063138What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.