Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40063130›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2025

Visual categorisation of images of familiar objects based on their authenticity: an fMRI study.

Grace A Gabriel, Cristina Simões-Franklin, Georgia O'Callaghan, John Stapleton, Fiona N Newell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Grace A GabrielSchool of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Cristina Simões-FranklinSchool of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Georgia O'CallaghanSchool of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
John StapletonSchool of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Fiona N NewellSchool of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. fiona.newell@tcd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7363-2346

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under most circumstances, we can rely visual information to quickly and accurately discriminate "real" objects (e.g., fresh fruit) from "fake" objects (e.g., plastic fruit). It is unclear, however, whether this distinction is made early along the ventral visual stream when basic object features such as colour (e.g., primary visual cortex; V1) and texture (e.g., collateral sulcus; COS) are being processed, or whether information regarding object authenticity is extracted in later visual or memory regions (e.g., perirhinal cortex, lateral occipital cortex). To examine this question, participants were placed in an fMRI scanner, and presented with 300 objects photographed in colour or greyscale. Half of the objects were fake, and the other half were real. The participant's task was to categorise each image as presenting either a real or fake object. Broadly, our analyses revealed significant activation in CoS when participants categorised real objects, particularly when they were presented in colour. We also observed activation in V1 for coloured objects, particularly real ones. These results suggest that our seemingly intuitive ability to rapidly discriminate real from fake objects occurs at the early stages of visual processing, such as when the brain is extracting surface-feature information like texture (CoS) or colour (V1). Future studies could consider the time course of these neural events and probe the importance of cross-modal (e.g., audition and haptic) information underpinning feature extraction for distinguishing real from fake objects.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyVisual CortexAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultCategorisationCoSFakeObject perceptionRealTexture

Identifiers

PMID40063130
PMCPMC11893674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.