ArticleCalcified tissue international2025
Calcaneal Ultrasound Attenuation: Does the Region of Interest and Loading Influence the Repeatability of Measurement?
Article in Calcified tissue international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current calcaneal quantitative ultrasound systems assess different regions of interest (ROI), under different levels of lower limb loading, yield different parameter values, and are likely prone to different levels of error. This study evaluated the repeatability of measures of frequency-dependent attenuation (FDA, 0.3-0.8 MHz) at three calcaneal ROI, Brooke-Wavell (BW), Jaworski (JA), and foot gauge (FG), under four loading conditions (non-weightbearing, semi-weightbearing, bipedal stance, and unipedal stance). FDA in the calcaneus was assessed in 20 healthy participants (mean (± SD) age, 41.7 ± 19.6 years; height, 1.70 ± 0.16 m; and weight, 70.1 ± 23.0 kg) using a custom-built transmission-mode ultrasound system. Reliability was evaluated using the standard error of measurement (SEM) and limits of agreement (LA) and tolerance (95%TL). Differences in mean FDA values between ROI, loading, and measurement occasions were assessed using a repeated measures ANOVA (α = .05). Mean FDA values ranged between 58.0 ± 32.0 and 77.2 ± 27.6 dB/MHz across all conditions. Repeatability of FDA was dependent on the ROI examined and tended to improve with weightbearing. The narrowest limits for 95%TL ranged between ± 15.1 dB/MHz (JA SWB) and ± 62.7 dB/MHz (BW NWB) across sites. The SEM was approximately 10 dB/MHz for both FG and JA during non-weightbearing and was reduced to around 5 dB/MHz with full weightbearing. This study demonstrates that, although measures of ultrasound FDA are dependent on the ROI, lower limb loading may be a useful method to improve the repeatability of FDA measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.