ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Missed injuries in pediatric trauma care : Still a challenge].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Missed injuries (MI) in children and adolescents with multiple injuries represent a major challenge in pediatric trauma care despite the availability of standard examination protocols and imaging procedures. In the initial phase of care the primary survey is essentially important for the detection and treatment of life-threatening injuries and is well established. After stabilization of the patient in the trauma room and the first phase of treatment, a secondary survey and a tertiary survey should be carried out in order to detect initially MI in the further course and avoid longer term consequences. The majority of MI involve head, thoracic and extremity injuries. Risk factors for MI are younger patient age, the presence of multiple trauma, a higher injury severity score (ISS), a lower value on the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit. While MI are frequently described in severely or multiply injured children, a high proportion of MIs are also found in children transferred from other institutions. Therefore, two case studies from a pediatric trauma center at a maximum care hospital and a literature analysis are used to analyze typical MIs. These case examples underline the importance of adhering to a standardized treatment regimen for this patient group. It is advisable to develop a standard operating procedure (SOP) with a corresponding risk score, which regulates the tertiary survey, the times of the follow-up examinations and the corresponding (specialist) specific responsibilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40063092What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.