ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2025
Perceptual adaptation to dysarthric speech is modulated by concurrent phonological processing: A dual task study.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Listeners can adapt to noise-vocoded speech under divided attention using a dual task design [Wang, Chen, Yan, McGettigan, Rosen, and Adank, Trends Hear. 27, 23312165231192297 (2023)]. Adaptation to noise-vocoded speech, an artificial degradation, was largely unaffected for domain-general (visuomotor) and domain-specific (semantic or phonological) dual tasks. The study by Wang et al. was replicated in an online between-subject experiment with 4 conditions (N = 192) using 40 dysarthric sentences, a natural, real-world variation of the speech signal listeners can adapt to, to provide a closer test of the role of attention in adaptation. Participants completed a speech-only task (control) or a dual task, aiming to recruit domain-specific (phonological or lexical) or domain-general (visual) attentional processes. The results showed initial suppression of adaptation in the phonological condition during the first ten trials in addition to poorer overall speech comprehension compared to the speech-only, lexical, and visuomotor conditions. Yet, as there was no difference in the rate of adaptation across the 40 trials for the 4 conditions, it was concluded that perceptual adaptation to dysarthric speech could occur under divided attention, and it seems likely that adaptation is an automatic cognitive process that can occur under load.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.