ArticleJAMA network open2025
Emergency Care, Hospitalization Rates, and Floods.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respiratory Emergencies in Disasters: A Narrative Review.Thoracic research and practice · 2026Article
- Cross-Border Meteorological Disaster Medical Rescue Policies in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: A Policy Text Quality Evaluation by PMC Index Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- US Emergency Department Use and Operations Amid Natural Disasters: A Narrative Review.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Impacts of Natural Disasters on Emergency Care Delivery in the United States: A Scoping Review and Digital Health-Informed Framework.Environmental health insights · 2026Review
- Climate Change and Cardiovascular Health: Environmental Stressors, Mechanistic Insights, and Clinical Perspectives.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Flooding is a major environmental hazard, with events increasing in intensity and frequency in the context of climate change. Floods cause significant health and economic impacts, particularly among vulnerable populations, including older adults. However, comprehensive analyses of the health consequences of flooding remain limited. Objective: To evaluate the morbidity and health care costs among Medicare beneficiaries associated with flood exposure in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study analyzed emergency department (ED) use and unplanned hospitalization among Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older living in zip code tabulation areas (ZCTAs) that were exposed to large-scale flood events from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2017. This analysis was conducted from April 3 to December 15, 2023. Exposure: The primary exposure was the presence of a flood as recorded in the Multisourced Flood Inventories, a spatially distributed flood database. Main Outcomes and Measures: A conditional fixed-effects regression approach was used to explore the incidence of all-case and cause-specific ED visits and hospitalizations before and after floods. The primary outcomes measured were the incident rate ratios (IRRs) and associated 95% CIs. Attributable risk percentages and estimated attributable excess visits were calculated. Stratified analyses were performed for evaluation of effect modification. Health care costs associated with these events were measured and standardized to 2017 US dollars. Results: Among 11 801 527 Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older (mean [SD] age, 74.4 [7.6] years; 56.3% female), the rate of all-cause ED visits and hospital admissions increased by 4.8% (IRR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04-1.05) and 7.4% (IRR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.07-1.08) after flood exposure, respectively. The mean ZCTA-level cost was $3230 (95% CI, $3198-$3261) per ED visit and $11 310 (95% CI, $11 252-$11 367) for hospitalizations. The national costs to the Medicare system were estimated to be $69 275 429 (95% CI, $63 010 840-$76 315 210) for ED visits and $191 409 579 (95% CI, $172 782 870-$206 181 300) for hospitalizations. Stratified analyses highlighted greater impacts for certain demographic groups, including adults older than 85 years, and specific seasonal patterns. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older, flood exposure was associated with increased health care use and costs, underscoring the need for targeted public health strategies and improved disaster preparedness, especially for older adults. These findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the health-related costs of flooding and can be used to inform future climate change resilience and health care planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.