Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40063022›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Estimated Effectiveness of Nirsevimab Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus.

Hanmeng Xu, Camila Aparicio, Aanchal Wats, Barbara L Araujo, Virginia E Pitzer, Joshua L Warren, Eugene D Shapiro, Linda M Niccolai, Daniel M Weinberger, Carlos R Oliveira

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. The Effectiveness of Nirsevimab on Antibiotic Use in Children Using Target Trial Emulation.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hanmeng XuDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Camila AparicioDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Aanchal WatsDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Barbara L AraujoDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Virginia E PitzerDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Joshua L WarrenDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Eugene D ShapiroDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Linda M NiccolaiDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Daniel M WeinbergerDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Carlos R OliveiraDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Funding

Real-World Effectiveness of Perinatal RSV ImmunoprophylaxisR01AI179874 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Carlos Rafael Oliveira · 2024 to 2026
$2.5M
Clinical Epidemiology of Pediatric COVID-19 and MIS-CK23AI159518 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI OLIVEIRA, CARLOS RAFAEL · 2021 to 2024
$729k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI159518NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI179874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceNirsevimab, a long-acting monoclonal antibody, demonstrated efficacy against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in clinical trials. Postlicensure monitoring is essential to confirm these benefits in clinical settings.

objectiveTo estimate the effectiveness of nirsevimab against medically attended RSV infections in infants and to assess how effectiveness varies by disease severity, dosage, and time since immunization. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis test-negative case-control study utilized inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department data from the Yale New Haven Health System. Nirsevimab-eligible infants who were tested for RSV using polymerase chain reaction between October 1, 2023, and May 9, 2024, were included. Infants with RSV-positive results were cases and infants with RSV-negative results were controls. EXPOSURE: Nirsevimab immunization, verified through state immunization registries. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Effectiveness was estimated using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for age, calendar month, and potential confounders. Separate models examined estimated effectiveness by clinical setting, dosage, time since immunization, and severity (defined as needing high-flow oxygen or intensive care unit admission). Broader outcomes were also analyzed, including all-cause LRTI and all-cause LRTI-associated hospitalization.

resultsThe analytic sample included 3090 infants (1722 male [57.3%]; median [IQR] age at testing, 6.7 [3.6-9.7] months), with 680 (22.0%) RSV-positive cases and 2410 (78.0%) RSV-negative controls. Nirsevimab uptake was 10.7% (330 patients), with 21 RSV-positive cases and 309 RSV-negative controls immunized. Adjusted effectiveness was 68.4% (95% CI, 50.3%-80.8%) against medically attended RSV infection, 61.6% (95% CI, 35.6%-78.6%) against outpatient visits, and 80.5% (95% CI, 52.0%-93.5%) against hospitalizations. The highest estimated effectiveness (84.6%; 95% CI, 58.7%-95.6%) was observed against severe RSV disease. Although estimated effectiveness against RSV infections declined from 79.3% (95% CI, 63.4%-90.6%) at 2 weeks postimmunization to 54.8% (95% CI, 16.3%-74.7%) at 14 weeks postimmunization, it remained significant. Estimated effectiveness did not vary substantially by dosage. During peak RSV season, nirsevimab appeared effective against all-cause LRTI (49.4%; 95% CI, 10.7%-72.9%) and all-cause LRTI-associated hospitalizations (79.1%; 95% CI, 27.6%-94.9%). From February to May 2024, when most LRTIs were caused by other viruses, its estimated effectiveness against these broader outcomes was negligible. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this case-control study, nirsevimab provided substantial protection against RSV-associated outcomes. These findings support its continued use and provide evidence that may help boost public confidence in the immunization program.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntiviral AgentsRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleRespiratory Syncytial Virus, HumanTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID40063022
PMCPMC11894488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.