Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40062909›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2025

Estimating the Effects of Hypothetical Ambient

Chengyi Lin, Riyang Liu, Caroline Sutton, Andrew T DeWan, Laura Forastiere, Kai Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chengyi LinDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Riyang LiuDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Caroline SuttonDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Andrew T DeWanYale Center for Perinatal, Pediatric and Environmental Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Laura ForastiereDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Kai ChenDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0164-1112

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging evidence identifies ambient particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter

objectivesOur aim was to estimate the total effects of hypothetical ambient

methodsWe used data from 291,495 participants in the UK Biobank cohort who were free of dementia and

resultsIn comparison with no intervention, the estimated 10-y risk difference of dementia was DISCUSSION: The estimated 10-y risk of dementia decreased if the individual ambient

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionDementiaEnvironmental ExposureParticulate MatterAgedBiological Specimen BanksCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsUK BiobankUnited KingdomAir PollutantsParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID40062909
PMCPMC12010936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.