ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2025
Nomogram Prediction for Gastric Cancer Development.
Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A biomarker-integrated nomogram for predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula in low- to intermediate-risk patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of a predictive model for mortality risk in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Development of a carbon nanoparticle-guided nomogram for predicting lateral cervical lymph node metastasis in clinically node-negative papillary thyroid carcinoma.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHelicobacter pylori ( Hp ) and gastric atrophy represent significant risk factors for gastric cancer (GC). Nevertheless, to date, no nomogram has been developed to predict GC based on the specific combination of risk factors present in individual cases.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using health screening data collected between 2003 and 2018. Subjects with positive results for anti- Hp antibody were enrolled. Individuals were classified into 4 groups: low-B (low titer without atrophy), high-B (high titer without atrophy), high-C (high titer with atrophy), and low-C (low titer with atrophy). Nomogram prediction models were developed for overall GCs as well as intestinal and diffuse cancers, with each type considered a competing event, by using both Cox proportional and subdistribution hazard models. Prediction performance was evaluated using the concordance index (c-index) and the area under the curve through 10-fold cross-validation.
resultsDuring a median follow-up period of 5.7 years, 231 new GC cases developed among the total cohort of 28,311 subjects, including 159 intestinal type, 68 diffuse type, and 4 cases of unknown type. Multivariable analyses indicated that age, body mass index, family history, smoking, and classification into the high-C or low-C group were significant predictors of GC. The nomograms for intestinal type, diffuse type, and total GC demonstrated area under the curve values of 0.82, 0.62, and 0.75, respectively, and c-indices of 0.85, 0.54, and 0.76, respectively. DISCUSSION: The nomograms for GC prediction would be useful in identifying high-risk individuals, particularly for intestinal type. This would facilitate the implementation of personalized eradication and intensive screening strategies to target those at higher risk for GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.