ArticleCancer medicine2025
A Novel Prognostic Risk-Scoring Model Based on RAS Gene-Associated Cluster in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and validation of RAS signaling-related genes for prognostic prediction and immunological characterization in gastric cancer.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Prognostic Risk Model of Megakaryocyte-Erythroid Progenitor (MEP) Signature Based on AHSP and MYB in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith the rapid development of diagnostic techniques and treatment strategies, there are notable improvements in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) prognosis. Nevertheless, the pathogenesis of AML remains largely unknown. This study aims to investigate the RAS pathway-associated genes based on bioinformatics analysis, and investigate their underlying mechanisms in the initiation and progression of AML. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe UCSC Xena database was the source of the training set data, while the GSE192638 dataset was the source of the validation set data. Children in the training set were split up into two groups according to RAS pathway-associated genes, and then differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of them were screened. To discover prognosis-related genes and develop a prognostic risk-scoring model, we employed One-way Cox and LASSO regression analysis. The performance of the model was assessed by an independent validation dataset. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curve. Furthermore, we investigated the association between the prognostic risk-scoring model and the correlation between immune infiltration and drug sensitivity. The expression levels of genes associated with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction were quantified.
resultsWe built a prognostic risk-scoring model comprising 26 DEGs. Depending on the risk score, AML patients were split up into two groups: high- and low-risk groups. Notably, compared with the survival time of patients in the high- risk group, that in the low-risk group was substantially prolonged. Univariate (uniCox) as well as multivariate Cox (multiCox) regression analyses were carried out, demonstrating that the risk score emerged as a separate risk factor for prognosis. A nomogram that incorporates clinical factors and prognostic risk scores was proposed to increase the accuracy of survival rates estimation. Subsequent analyses revealed significant connections of the risk score with the immune infiltration and drug sensitivity. The experimental results demonstrated significantly elevated expression levels of GCSAML, MED12L, and TCF4 in AML samples compared to normal samples.
conclusionThe developed prognostic risk-scoring model, along with the identified key risk genes, holds promise as candidate prognostic biomarkers and treatment targets for pediatric AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.