ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2025
Advancements in machine learning and biomarker integration for prenatal Down syndrome screening.
Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): A Paradigm Shift in Prenatal Care.International journal of preventive medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of machine learning (ML) in biomarker analysis for predicting Down syndrome exemplifies an innovative strategy that enhances diagnostic accuracy and enables early detection. Recent studies demonstrate the effectiveness of ML algorithms in identifying genetic variations and expression patterns associated with Down syndrome by comparing genomic data from affected individuals and their typically developing peers. This review examines how ML and biomarker analysis improve prenatal screening for Down syndrome. Advancements show that integrating maternal serum markers, nuchal translucency measurements, and ultrasonographic images with algorithms, such as random forests and deep learning convolutional neural networks, raises detection rates to above 85% while keeping false positive rates low. Moreover, non-invasive prenatal testing with soft ultrasound markers has increased diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, marking a significant shift in prenatal care. The review highlights the importance of implementing robust screening protocols that utilize ultrasound biomarkers, along with developing personalized screening tools through advanced statistical methods. It also explores the potential of combining genetic and epigenetic biomarkers with ML to further improve diagnostic accuracy and understanding of Down syndrome pathophysiology. The findings stress the need for ongoing research to optimize algorithms, validate their effectiveness across diverse populations, and incorporate these cutting-edge approaches into routine clinical practice. Ultimately, blending advanced imaging techniques with ML shows promise for enhancing prenatal care outcomes and aiding informed decision-making for expectant parents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.