Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40062699›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2025

Advancements in machine learning and biomarker integration for prenatal Down syndrome screening.

Mahsa Danaei, Heewa Rashnavadi, Maryam Yeganegi, Seyed Alireza Dastgheib, Reza Bahrami, Sepideh Azizi, Fatemeh Jayervand, Ali Masoudi, Amirhossein Shahbazi, Amirmasoud Shiri and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): A Paradigm Shift in Prenatal Care.International journal of preventive medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mahsa DanaeiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9948-8290
Heewa RashnavadiStudent Research Committee, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-5597-0982
Maryam YeganegiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Iranshahr University of Medical Sciences, Iranshahr, Iran.ORCID 0009-0007-1625-6384
Seyed Alireza DastgheibDepartment of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4781-301X
Reza BahramiNeonatal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-8554-4562
Sepideh AziziShahid Akbarabadi Clinical Research Development Unit, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5702-7958
Fatemeh JayervandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0009-0009-4303-3981
Ali MasoudiStudent Research Committee, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.ORCID 0009-0001-0779-4769
Amirhossein ShahbaziStudent Research Committee, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-2229-5295
Amirmasoud ShiriStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID 0009-0003-9057-9756
Kazem AghiliDepartment of Radiology, Shahid Rahnamoun Hospital, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.ORCID 0009-0007-3226-5571
Mahta MazaheriMother and Newborn Health Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4164-3400
Hossein NeamatzadehMother and Newborn Health Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-1031-9288

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of machine learning (ML) in biomarker analysis for predicting Down syndrome exemplifies an innovative strategy that enhances diagnostic accuracy and enables early detection. Recent studies demonstrate the effectiveness of ML algorithms in identifying genetic variations and expression patterns associated with Down syndrome by comparing genomic data from affected individuals and their typically developing peers. This review examines how ML and biomarker analysis improve prenatal screening for Down syndrome. Advancements show that integrating maternal serum markers, nuchal translucency measurements, and ultrasonographic images with algorithms, such as random forests and deep learning convolutional neural networks, raises detection rates to above 85% while keeping false positive rates low. Moreover, non-invasive prenatal testing with soft ultrasound markers has increased diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, marking a significant shift in prenatal care. The review highlights the importance of implementing robust screening protocols that utilize ultrasound biomarkers, along with developing personalized screening tools through advanced statistical methods. It also explores the potential of combining genetic and epigenetic biomarkers with ML to further improve diagnostic accuracy and understanding of Down syndrome pathophysiology. The findings stress the need for ongoing research to optimize algorithms, validate their effectiveness across diverse populations, and incorporate these cutting-edge approaches into routine clinical practice. Ultimately, blending advanced imaging techniques with ML shows promise for enhancing prenatal care outcomes and aiding informed decision-making for expectant parents.

Indexed as

biomarkersDown syndromeepigeneticsgenetic profilingMachine learningprenatal screeningtrisomy 21

Identifiers

PMID40062699
PMCPMC11894766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.