ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Inferring gene regulatory networks from time-series scRNA-seq data via GRANGER causal recurrent autoencoders.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks in Stem Cells: Methods and Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Review
- PLNFGL: joint estimation of multi-condition gene networks from single-cell RNA-seq data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- From time-course expression to gene regulation: direct linear ODE inference without finite-difference approximation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Graph Learning in Bioinformatics: A Survey of Graph Neural Network Architectures, Biological Graph Construction and Bioinformatics Applications.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Revolution in Transcriptomics: From Single Cells to Spatial Atlases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Inflammasomes meet organoids and artificial intelligence: unraveling the complexity of gynecological inflammation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- FastSCODE: an accelerated SCODE algorithm for inferring gene regulatory networks on manycore processors.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- KEGNI: knowledge graph enhanced framework for gene regulatory network inference.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Reconstructing Dynamic Gene Regulatory Networks Using f-Divergence from Time-Series scRNA-Seq Data.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- GSNCASCR: An R Package to Identify Differentially Co-Expressed Curated Gene Sets with Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technology provides valuable data resources for inferring gene regulatory networks (GRNs), enabling deeper insights into cellular mechanisms and diseases. While many methods exist for inferring GRNs from static scRNA-seq data, current approaches face challenges in accurately handling time-series scRNA-seq data due to high noise levels and data sparsity. The temporal dimension introduces additional complexity by requiring models to capture dynamic changes, increasing sensitivity to noise, and exacerbating data sparsity across time points. In this study, we introduce GRANGER, an unsupervised deep learning-based method that integrates multiple advanced techniques, including a recurrent variational autoencoder, GRANGER causality, sparsity-inducing penalties, and negative binomial (NB)-based loss functions, to infer GRNs. GRANGER was evaluated using multiple popular benchmarking datasets, where it demonstrated superior performance compared to eight well-known GRN inference methods. The integration of a NB-based loss function and sparsity-inducing penalties in GRANGER significantly enhanced its capacity to address dropout noise and sparsity in scRNA-seq data. Additionally, GRANGER exhibited robustness against high levels of dropout noise. We applied GRANGER to scRNA-seq data from the whole mouse brain obtained through the BRAIN Initiative project and identified GRNs for five transcription regulators: E2f7, Gbx1, Sox10, Prox1, and Onecut2, which play crucial roles in diverse brain cell types. The inferred GRNs not only recalled many known regulatory relationships but also revealed sets of novel regulatory interactions with functional potential. These findings demonstrate that GRANGER is a highly effective tool for real-world applications in discovering novel gene regulatory relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.