Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40062376›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025

Olfactory Receptor Responses to Pure Odorants in Drosophila melanogaster.

Alja Lüdke, Ajayrama Kumaraswamy, C Giovanni Galizia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alja LüdkeUniversity of Konstanz, Constance, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2212-4680
Ajayrama KumaraswamyUniversity of Konstanz, Constance, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7928-877X
C Giovanni GaliziaUniversity of Konstanz, Constance, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8292-6031

Funding

Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) EXC 2117 422037984Wissenschaftskolleg zu BerlinZukunftskolleg, University of Konstanz
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfactory coding relies on primary information from olfactory receptor cells that respond to volatile airborne substances. Despite extensive efforts, our understanding of odor-response profiles across receptors is still poor, because of the vast number of possible ligands (odorants), the high sensitivity even to trace compounds (creating false positive responses), and the diversity of olfactory receptors. Here, we linked chemical purification with a gas chromatograph to single-receptor type recording with transgenic flies using calcium imaging to record olfactory responses to a large panel of chemicals in seven Drosophila ORs: Or10a, Or13a, Or22a, Or42b, Or47a, Or56a, and Or92a. We analyze the data using linear-nonlinear modeling and reveal that most receptors have "simple" response types (mostly positive: Or10a, Or13a, Or22a, Or47a, and Or56a). However, two receptors (Or42b and Or92a) have, in addition to "simple" responses, "complex" response types to some ligands, either positive with a negative second phase or negative with a positive second phase, suggesting the presence of multiple binding sites and/or transduction cascades. We show that some ligands reported in the literature are false positives, because of contaminations in the stimulus. We recorded all stimuli across concentrations, showing that at different concentrations, different substances appear as best ligands. Our data show that studying combinatorial olfactory coding must consider temporal response properties and odorant concentration and, in addition, is strongly influenced by the presence of trace amounts of ligands (contaminations) in the samples. These observations have important repercussions for our thinking about how animals navigate their olfactory environment.

Indexed as

OdorantsOlfactory Receptor NeuronsReceptors, OdorantSmellAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsReceptors, Odorantcalcium imagingDrosophila melanogasterodor‐response profilesolfactory impuritiespurified odorants

Identifiers

PMID40062376
PMCPMC11891828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.