Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40062361›Full record

ArticlePM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2025

Assessing the beliefs and impacts of strength training in a Division I collegiate gymnastics team.

Tammy Ng, Tyler Bendrick, Mary Swanstrom, Ellen Casey, Machelle Wilson, Kevin Burnham, Marcia Faustin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Assessing the beliefs and impacts of strength training in a Division I collegiate gymnastics team.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tammy NgDepartment of Pediatrics, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7578-3706
Tyler BendrickDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Mary SwanstromUC Davis Sports Medicine, Davis, California, USA.
Ellen CaseyDepartment of Physiatry, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0139-8826
Machelle WilsonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, Clinical and Translational Science Center, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA.
Kevin BurnhamDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5922-4311
Marcia FaustinDepartment of Internal Medicine, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditionally, there has been a reluctance to use weight training with female gymnasts due to concerns that it could cause detrimental increases in muscle mass and impede flexibility. Recent literature has demonstrated that strength training has no significant effect on flexibility and can improve athletic performance.

objectiveTo assess in a pilot study the perceptions of collegiate gymnasts and coaches toward strength training after starting inaugural strength and conditioning training.

designSurvey-based study.

settingNational Collegiate Athletics Association Division I women's gymnastics program at a public university in California.

participantsOf the 23 gymnasts surveyed, 17 (74%) responded to the survey. Of the two coaches surveyed, both (100%) responded to the survey.

interventionsNot applicable.

main outcome measuresDescriptive statistics characterizing demographics, characteristics of gymnasts' strength and conditioning program, and perceptions regarding the safety of strength training and its impact on performance, body shape, flexibility, and injury rates.

resultsMost gymnasts agreed (35%) or strongly agreed (59%) that weight training may improve performance. All gymnasts disagreed (59%) or strongly disagreed (41%) that weight training is not safe; 41% disagreed, 29% strongly disagreed, and 17% agreed that weight training may negatively affect body shape. Most gymnasts disagreed (59%) or strongly disagreed (18%) that weight training decreases flexibility; four (24%) felt neutral. Eighty three percent (59% strongly agree, 24% agree) felt that weight training had a positive impact on performance. More than half of the gymnasts either agreed (24%) or strongly agreed (29%) they had fewer injuries the season after implementing weight training, compared to prior seasons. Both coaches similarly endorsed the safety of strength training and its potential to improve performance.

conclusionsIn this pilot study, collegiate gymnasts and coaches expressed generally positive perceptions toward the safety of strength training and its effect on performance. A small number of gymnasts expressed concerns regarding the effects of weight training on body shape and flexibility.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceGymnasticsMuscle StrengthResistance TrainingAdultCaliforniaFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40062361
PMCPMC12238741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.