ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
A lightweight coal-gangue detection model based on parallel deep residual networks.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To realize the accurate identification of coal-gangue in the process of underground coal transportation and the low-cost deployment of the model, a lightweight coal-gangue detection model based on the parallel depth residual network, called P-RNet, is proposed. For the problem of images of coal-gangue taken under complex conditions, the feature extraction module (FEM) is designed using decoupling training and inference methods. Furthermore, for the problem of the nearest neighbor interpolation upsampling method being prone to produce mosaic blocks and edge jagged edges, a lightweight upsampling operator is used to optimize the feature fusion module (FFM). Finally, to solve the problem, the stochastic gradient descent algorithm is prone to local suboptimal solutions and saddle point problems in the error function optimization process, numerous experiments are carried out on selecting the initial learning rate, and the Lookahead optimizer is used to optimize parameters during backpropagation. Experimental results show that the proposed model can effectively improve the recognition effect, with a corresponding low deployment cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.