Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40062292›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Filipino sign language alphabet recognition using Persistent Homology Classification algorithm.

Cristian B Jetomo, Mark Lexter D De Lara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cristian B JetomoInstitute of Mathematical Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.
Mark Lexter D De LaraInstitute of Mathematical Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0003-3883-7773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing number of deaf or hard-of-hearing individuals is a crucial problem since communication among and within the deaf population proves to be a challenge. Despite sign languages developing in various countries, there is still lack of formal implementation of programs supporting its needs, especially for the Filipino sign language (FSL). Recently, studies on FSL recognition explored deep networks. Current findings are promising but drawbacks on using deep networks still prevail. This includes low transparency, interpretability, need for big data, and high computational requirements. Hence, this article explores topological data analysis (TDA), an emerging field of study that harnesses techniques from computational topology, for this task. Specifically, we evaluate a TDA-inspired classifier called Persistent Homology Classification algorithm (PHCA) to classify static alphabet signed using FSL and compare its result with classical classifiers. Experiment is implemented on balanced and imbalanced datasets with multiple trials, and hyperparameters are tuned for a comprehensive comparison. Results show that PHCA and support vector machine (SVM) performed better than the other classifiers, having mean Accuracy of 99.45% and 99.31%, respectively. Further analysis shows that PHCA's performance is not significantly different from SVM, indicating that PHCA performed at par with the best performing classifier. Misclassification analysis shows that PHCA struggles to classify signs with similar gestures, common to FSL recognition. Regardless, outcomes provide evidence on the robustness and stability of PHCA against perturbations to data and noise. It can be concluded that PHCA can serve as an alternative for FSL recognition, offering opportunities for further research.

Indexed as

Classification algorithmFilipino sign languagePersistent homologySign language recognitionTopological data analysis

Identifiers

PMID40062292
PMCPMC11888903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.