ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
An explainable multi-objective hybrid machine learning model for reducing heart failure mortality.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biodata-centric cardiovascular disease prediction using multi-objective genetic algorithm-driven deep ensembles.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the world grapples with pandemics and increasing stress levels among individuals, heart failure (HF) has emerged as a prominent cause of mortality on a global scale. The most effective approach to improving the chances of individuals' survival is to diagnose this condition at an early stage. Researchers widely utilize supervised feature selection techniques alongside conventional standalone machine learning (ML) algorithms to achieve the goal. However, these approaches may not consistently demonstrate robust performance when applied to data that they have not encountered before, and struggle to discern intricate patterns within the data. Hence, we present a Multi-objective Stacked Enable Hybrid Model (MO-SEHM), that aims to find out the best feature subsets out of numerous different sets, considering multiple objectives. The Stacked Enable Hybrid Model (SEHM) plays the role of classifier and integrates with a multi-objective feature selection method, the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II). We employed an HF dataset from the Faisalabad Institute of Cardiology (FIOC) and evaluated six ML models, including SEHM with and without NSGA-II for experimental purposes. The Pareto front (PF) demonstrates that our introduced MO-SEHM surpasses the other models, obtaining 94.87% accuracy with the nine relevant features. Finally, we have applied Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) with MO-SEHM to explain the reasons for individual outcomes, which makes our model transparent to the patients and stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.