Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40062263›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

A quality assessment algorithm for no-reference images based on transfer learning.

Yang Yang, Chang Liu, Hui Wu, Dingguo Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yang YangCollege of Media Engineering, Communication University of Zhejiang, Hang Zhou, China.
Chang LiuCollege of Media Engineering, Communication University of Zhejiang, Hang Zhou, China.
Hui WuCollege of Media Engineering, Communication University of Zhejiang, Hang Zhou, China.
Dingguo YuCollege of Media Engineering, Communication University of Zhejiang, Hang Zhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image quality assessment (IQA) plays a critical role in automatically detecting and correcting defects in images, thereby enhancing the overall performance of image processing and transmission systems. While research on reference-based IQA is well-established, studies on no-reference image IQA remain underdeveloped. In this article, we propose a novel no-reference IQA algorithm based on transfer learning (IQA-NRTL). This algorithm leverages a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) due to its ability to effectively capture multi-scale semantic information features, which are essential for representing the complex visual perception in images. These features are extracted through a visual perception module. Subsequently, an adaptive fusion network integrates these features, and a fully connected regression network correlates the fused semantic information with global semantic information to perform the final quality assessment. Experimental results on authentically distorted datasets (KonIQ-10k, BIQ2021), synthetically distorted datasets (LIVE, TID2013), and an artificial intelligence (AI)-generated content dataset (AGIQA-1K) show that the proposed IQA-NRTL algorithm significantly improves performance compared to mainstream no-reference IQA algorithms, depending on variations in image content and complexity.

Indexed as

Adaptive fusion networkDeep convolutional neural networkImage quality assessment (IQA)Non-reference image quality assessment (IQA-NRTL)Transfer learning

Identifiers

PMID40062263
PMCPMC11888849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.