Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40062261›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Machine learning-based feature selection and classification for cerebral infarction screening: an experimental study.

Yang Niu, Xue Tao, Qinyuan Chang, Mingming Hu, Xin Li, Xiaoping Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yang NiuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Xue TaoAI Research Institute, iFLYTEK Co., LTD, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Qinyuan ChangAI Research Institute, iFLYTEK Co., LTD, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Mingming HuAI Research Institute, iFLYTEK Co., LTD, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Xin LiSchool of Information Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Xiaoping GaoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral infarction screening (CIS) is critical for timely intervention and improved patient outcomes. We investigate the application of machine learning techniques for feature selection and classification of speech and cognitive function assessments to enhance cerebral infarction screening. We analyze a dataset containing 117 patients (95 patients were diagnosed with cerebral infarction, and 54 were identified as lacunar cerebral infarction of them) comprising speech and cognitive function features from patients with lacunar and non-lacunar cerebral infarction, as well as healthy controls. In this article, we present a framework called CIS which comprises a cerebral infarction screening model to identify cerebral infarction from populations and a diagnostic model to classify lacunar infarction, non-lacunar infarction, and healthy controls. Feature selection method, Recursive Feature Elimination with Cross-Validation (RFECV), is employed to identify the most relevant features. Various classifiers, such as support vector machine, K-nearest neighbor, decision tree, random forest, logistic regression, and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were evaluated for their performance in binary and ternary classification tasks. The CIS based on XGBoost classifier achieved the highest accuracy of 88.89% in the binary classification task (

Indexed as

Cerebral infarction screeningFeature selectionMachine learningSpeech and cognitive function assessment

Identifiers

PMID40062261
PMCPMC11888919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.