ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Automated evaluation systems to enhance exam quality and reduce test anxiety.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
University examination papers play a crucial role in the institution's quality, impacting the institution's accreditation status. In this context, ensuring the quality of examination papers is paramount. In practice, however, manual assessments are mostly laborious and time-consuming and generally lack consistency. The last decade has seen digital education acquire immense interest in academic discourse, especially when developing intelligent systems for educational assessment. The presented work proposes an automated system that allows text analysis and evaluation of university exam papers by formal and technical criteria. The research was conducted by analyzing 30 exam papers, which will be included in each of the exam papers, which consist of 60 questions each, in total it holds 1,800 questions. Moreover, it also includes research to understand the quality and relationship with students' test anxiety. A total of 50 year one first-year students were taken to measure students' academic stress by a scale. Planning on basic levels and adherence to technical standards were missing in the exam papers. The proposed automated system has improved exam paper quality to a great extent and reduced academic stress among students with an accuracy of 98% in identifying and matching specified criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.