ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Enhancing breast cancer prediction through stacking ensemble and deep learning integration.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A time‑dependent risk prediction model for distant metastasis in early‑stage breast cancer based on explainable ensemble learning: a retrospective cohort study.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Adaptive quantum kernel selection via leakage-free stacking for clinical diagnostics on NISQ hardware.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A machine learning based framework for predictive school management using student and faculty analytics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Ensemble Deep Learning-Based High-Precision Framework for Breast Cancer Detection from Histopathological Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Interpretable deep learning for gastric cancer detection: a fusion of AI architectures and explainability analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Comparative performance of twelve machine learning models in predicting COVID-19 mortality risk in children: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Brazil.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most common types of cancer in women and is recognized as a serious global public health issue. The increasing incidence of breast cancer emphasizes the importance of early detection, which enhances the effectiveness of treatment processes. In addressing this challenge, the importance of machine learning and deep learning technologies is increasingly recognized. The aim of this study is to evaluate the integration of ensemble models and deep learning models using stacking ensemble techniques on the Breast Cancer Wisconsin (Diagnostic) dataset and to enhance breast cancer diagnosis through this methodology. To achieve this, the efficacy of ensemble methods such as Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, ExtraTrees, HistGradientBoosting, AdaBoost, GradientBoosting, and CatBoost in modeling breast cancer diagnosis was comprehensively evaluated. In addition to ensemble methods, deep learning models including convolutional neural network (CNN), recurrent neural network (RNN), gated recurrent unit (GRU), bidirectional long short-term memory (BILSTM), long short-term memory (LSTM) were analyzed as meta predictors. Among these models, CNN stood out for its high accuracy and rapid training time, making it an ideal choice for real-time diagnostic applications. Finally, the study demonstrated how breast cancer prediction was enhanced by integrating a set of base predictors, such as LightGBM, ExtraTrees, and CatBoost, with a deep learning-based meta-predictor, such as CNN, using stacking ensemble methodology. This stacking integration model offers significant potential for healthcare decision support systems with high accuracy, F1 score, and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC), along with reduced training times. The results from this research offer important insights for enhancing decision-making strategies in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.