Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40062255›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Enhancing breast cancer prediction through stacking ensemble and deep learning integration.

Fatih Gurcan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fatih GurcanDepartment of Management Information Systems, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most common types of cancer in women and is recognized as a serious global public health issue. The increasing incidence of breast cancer emphasizes the importance of early detection, which enhances the effectiveness of treatment processes. In addressing this challenge, the importance of machine learning and deep learning technologies is increasingly recognized. The aim of this study is to evaluate the integration of ensemble models and deep learning models using stacking ensemble techniques on the Breast Cancer Wisconsin (Diagnostic) dataset and to enhance breast cancer diagnosis through this methodology. To achieve this, the efficacy of ensemble methods such as Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, ExtraTrees, HistGradientBoosting, AdaBoost, GradientBoosting, and CatBoost in modeling breast cancer diagnosis was comprehensively evaluated. In addition to ensemble methods, deep learning models including convolutional neural network (CNN), recurrent neural network (RNN), gated recurrent unit (GRU), bidirectional long short-term memory (BILSTM), long short-term memory (LSTM) were analyzed as meta predictors. Among these models, CNN stood out for its high accuracy and rapid training time, making it an ideal choice for real-time diagnostic applications. Finally, the study demonstrated how breast cancer prediction was enhanced by integrating a set of base predictors, such as LightGBM, ExtraTrees, and CatBoost, with a deep learning-based meta-predictor, such as CNN, using stacking ensemble methodology. This stacking integration model offers significant potential for healthcare decision support systems with high accuracy, F1 score, and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC), along with reduced training times. The results from this research offer important insights for enhancing decision-making strategies in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast cancer predictionDeep learningEmpirical studyEnsemble learningStacking ensemble modelStacking integration

Identifiers

PMID40062255
PMCPMC11888877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.