Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40062252›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Deep learning-based novel ensemble method with best score transferred-adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system for energy consumption prediction.

Birce Dağkurs, İsmail Atacak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Birce DağkursGraduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Advanced Technologies, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
İsmail AtacakIoTLab, Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6357-0073

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Energy consumption predictions for smart homes and cities benefit many from homeowners to energy suppliers, allowing homeowners to understand and manage their future energy consumption, improve energy efficiency, and reduce energy costs. Predictions can help energy suppliers effectively distribute energy on demand. Therefore, from the past to the present, numerous methods have been conducted using collected data, employing both statistical and artificial intelligence (AI)-based approaches, to achieve successful energy consumption predictions. Methods: This study proposes a deep learning-based novel ensemble (DLBNE) method with the best score transferred-adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (BST-ANFIS) as a high-performance and robust approach for energy consumption prediction. The proposed method uses deep learning (DL)-based algorithms, including convolutional neural networks (CNN), recurrent neural networks (RNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), bidirectional long short-term memory (BI-LSTM), and gated recurrent units (GRUs) as base predictors. The BST-ANFIS architecture combines the individual outcomes of these predictors. In order to build a robust and dynamic prediction model, the interaction between the base predictors and the ANFIS architecture is achieved using a best score transfer approach. The performance of the proposed method in energy consumption prediction was verified through five DL methods, five machine learning (ML) methods, and a DL-based weighted average (DLBWA) ensemble method. Results: In experimental studies, the results were obtained from three-stage analyses: fold, average, and periodic performance analyses. In fold analyses, the proposed method, in terms of the root mean square error (RMSE) metric, demonstrated better performance in four folds on the Internet of Things (IoT)-based smart home (IBSH) dataset, two in the homestead city electricity consumption (HCEC) dataset, and two in the individual household power consumption (IHPC) dataset compared to the other methods. In the average performance analyses, it showed significantly higher performance than the other methods in all metrics for the IBSH and IHPC datasets, and in metrics except the mean absolute error (MAE) metric for the HCEC dataset. The performance results in terms of RMSE, MAE, mean square error (MSE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) metrics from these analyses were obtained as 0.001531, 0.001010, 0.0000031, and 0.001573 for the IBSH dataset; 0.025208, 0.005889, 0.001884, and 0.000137 for the HCEC dataset; and 0.013640, 0.006572, 0.000356, and 0.000943 for the IHPC dataset, respectively. The results of the 120-h periodic analyses also showed that the proposed method yielded a better prediction result than the other methods. Furthermore, a comparison of the proposed method with similar studies in the literature revealed that it demonstrated competitive performance in relation to the methods employed in those studies.

Indexed as

Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemDeep learningEnergy consumptionEnsemble learningMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40062252
PMCPMC11888908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.