Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40062245›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

An online intelligent detection method for slurry density in concept drift data streams based on collaborative computing.

Lanhao Wang, Hao Wang, Taojie Wei, Wei Dai, Hongyan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lanhao WangNational Engineering Research Center of Coal Preparation and Purification, China University of Mining Technology, XuZhou, Jiangsu, China.
Hao WangArtificial Intelligence Research Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, XuZhou, Jiangsu, China.
Taojie WeiSchool of Information and Control Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, XuZhou, Jiangsu, China.
Wei DaiArtificial Intelligence Research Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, XuZhou, Jiangsu, China.
Hongyan WangArtificial Intelligence Research Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, XuZhou, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In industrial environments, slurry density detection models often suffer from performance degradation due to concept drift. To address this, this article proposes an intelligent detection method tailored for slurry density in concept drift data streams. The method begins by building a model using Gaussian process regression (GPR) combined with regularized stochastic configuration. A sliding window-based online GPR is then applied to update the linear model's parameters, while a forgetting mechanism enables online recursive updates for the nonlinear model. Network pruning and stochastic configuration techniques dynamically adjust the nonlinear model's structure. These approaches enhance the mechanistic model's ability to capture dynamic relationships and reduce the data-driven model's reliance on outdated data. By focusing on recent data to reflect current operating conditions, the method effectively mitigates concept drift in complex process data. Additionally, the method is applied in industrial settings through collaborative computing, ensuring real-time slurry density detection and model adaptability. Experimental results on industrial data show that the proposed method outperforms other algorithms in all density estimation metrics, significantly improving slurry density detection accuracy.

Indexed as

Concept driftForgetting mechanismSliding windowSlurry densityStochastic configuration network

Identifiers

PMID40062245
PMCPMC11888939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.