Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40062241›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Lung image segmentation with improved U-Net, V-Net and Seg-Net techniques.

Fuat Turk, Mahmut Kılıçaslan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fuat TurkDepartment of Computer Engineering, Kirikkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8159-360X
Mahmut KılıçaslanDepartment of Computer Technologies, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1117-7736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis remains a significant health challenge worldwide, affecting a large population. Therefore, accurate diagnosis of this disease is a critical issue. With advancements in computer systems, imaging devices, and rapid progress in machine learning, tuberculosis diagnosis is being increasingly performed through image analysis. This study proposes three segmentation models based on U-Net, V-Net, and Seg-Net architectures to improve tuberculosis detection using the Shenzhen and Montgomery databases. These deep learning-based methods aim to enhance segmentation accuracy by employing advanced preprocessing techniques, attention mechanisms, and non-local blocks. Experimental results indicate that the proposed models outperform traditional approaches, particularly in terms of the Dice coefficient and accuracy values. The models have demonstrated robust performance on popular datasets. As a result, they contribute to more precise and reliable lung region segmentation, which is crucial for the accurate diagnosis of respiratory diseases like tuberculosis. In evaluations using various performance metrics, the proposed U-Net and V-Net models achieved Dice coefficient scores of 96.43% and 96.42%, respectively, proving their competitiveness and effectiveness in medical image analysis. These findings demonstrate that the Dice coefficient values of the proposed U-Net and V-Net models are more effective in tuberculosis segmentation than Seg-Net and other traditional methods.

Indexed as

Improved U-NetImproved V-NetLung segmentationMedical image processingSeg-Net architecture

Identifiers

PMID40062241
PMCPMC11888921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.