ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Lung image segmentation with improved U-Net, V-Net and Seg-Net techniques.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of lung cancer using Kronecker mobile forward harmonic net.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Fine-Tuned Segment Anything Model with Low-Rank Adaptation for Chest X-Ray Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Automated image inpainting for historical artifact restoration using hybridisation of transfer learning with deep generative models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning-assisted 3D CT angiography for supply-vessel localization in inflammatory peripheral pulmonary artery pseudoaneurysms.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Enhancing the Generalizability of Deep Learning-Based Models for Lung Field Segmentation in Chest Radiographs Using Edge-Assisted Multiscale Feature Fusion.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- An efficient deep learning-based morphology aware hierarchical mixture of features for tuberculosis screening using segmentation of chest X-ray images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Lung Segmentation with Lightweight Convolutional Attention Residual U-Net.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Applications, image analysis, and interpretation of computer vision in medical imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis remains a significant health challenge worldwide, affecting a large population. Therefore, accurate diagnosis of this disease is a critical issue. With advancements in computer systems, imaging devices, and rapid progress in machine learning, tuberculosis diagnosis is being increasingly performed through image analysis. This study proposes three segmentation models based on U-Net, V-Net, and Seg-Net architectures to improve tuberculosis detection using the Shenzhen and Montgomery databases. These deep learning-based methods aim to enhance segmentation accuracy by employing advanced preprocessing techniques, attention mechanisms, and non-local blocks. Experimental results indicate that the proposed models outperform traditional approaches, particularly in terms of the Dice coefficient and accuracy values. The models have demonstrated robust performance on popular datasets. As a result, they contribute to more precise and reliable lung region segmentation, which is crucial for the accurate diagnosis of respiratory diseases like tuberculosis. In evaluations using various performance metrics, the proposed U-Net and V-Net models achieved Dice coefficient scores of 96.43% and 96.42%, respectively, proving their competitiveness and effectiveness in medical image analysis. These findings demonstrate that the Dice coefficient values of the proposed U-Net and V-Net models are more effective in tuberculosis segmentation than Seg-Net and other traditional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.