ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2025
A Contemporary Review of Surgical Options in Laryngotracheal Stenosis.
Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive 10-year review of decannulation and perioperative complications in pediatric open airway reconstruction.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- 3D printing as an innovative tool in personalized management of complex airway diseases: a literature review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Association between anxiety and depression and sleep quality in benign laryngotracheal stenosis patients and analysis of risk factors.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upper airway stenosis is a potentially life-threatening condition that can occur at the level of the larynx, trachea, or multiple sites. It compromises breathing, coughing up secretions or voice production. To date, a wide range of endoscopic and open procedures have been described. Different techniques involve variable decannulation times, recurrence rates or complications. Improved breathing is a major concern for each method. However, other laryngeal functions should also be maintained with optimal voice quality and swallowing function. All these features create a constant challenge for stenosis surgery and, consequently, the need to verify and improve existing methods. A literature review was performed to provide an overview of the different treatment methods utilized in particular localizations. Supraglottic stenosis has a high rate of recurrence; nevertheless, it has a better prognosis than glottic or subglottic stenosis does. In this location, endoscopic surgery is preferable because of its decreased morbidity and optimal wound healing. Glottic stenosis includes bilateral vocal fold palsy (BVFP) and anterior and posterior glottic stenosis. Endoscopic resection combined with readhesion-reducing treatment is recommended for less advanced scars. Endoscopic laterofixation is a safe and easy method to perform for BVFP when there is potential for functional recurrence. Posterior cordotomy with partial arytenoidectomy is selected for patients with persistent disease. Subglottic stenosis is graded according to the Cotton-Myer classification, and open surgical procedures are more successful than endoscopic procedures in terms of decannulation rates and disease-free recurrence periods. The current guidelines concerning the treatment of LTS are still heterogeneous and cover a wide spectrum of procedures. Consequently, the therapy should be tailored individually to the patient, and the operator should be familiar with advantages related to different approaches. Future protocol development requires the standardization of qualification criteria and the verification of respiratory, voice and swallowing results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.