ArticleCureus2025
A Case of Successful Perioperative Rehabilitation in Two-Stage Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for an Intraoperative Acetabular Fracture: Insights Into Interim-Period Rehabilitation Strategies.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two-stage revision arthroplasty often results in poor functional outcomes. Rehabilitation strategies to maximize functional recovery after two-stage revision arthroplasty have not yet been established. This report presents a case of successful rehabilitation in two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). A 75-year-old Japanese woman underwent primary THA and experienced an intraoperative acetabular fracture. Staged revision THA was performed because of a large bone defect. After the first-stage implant removal, progressive muscle strength training, such as quadriceps and isometric exercises for the hip muscles, was performed with consideration of bone fusion, in addition to strengthening the unaffected limbs. During the interim period, an improvement in muscle strength was observed in both the upper and lower limbs. After the second-stage reimplantation, weight-bearing was gradually allowed. Three weeks after full weight-bearing was allowed, the patient was able to walk at 0.67 m/s with a cane. Further recovery of walking speed was achieved after a further four weeks of inpatient rehabilitation, reaching 0.90 m/s. In this case, interim-period muscle strength training was assumed to have contributed to early gait acquisition after reimplantation, without interfering with bony fusion. Well-worked muscle strength training to maintain or even improve muscle strength during the prosthesis-free interval may be important for functional recovery after two-stage revision arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.