Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40062165›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Case of Postoperative Lymphatic Ascites in Endometrial Cancer Spontaneously Resolving After Approximately One Year of Watchful Waiting.

Keisuke Takefushi, Yuji Tanaka, Tsukuru Amano, Shunichiro Tsuji, Takashi Murakami

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Keisuke TakefushiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, JPN.
Yuji TanakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, JPN.
Tsukuru AmanoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, JPN.
Shunichiro TsujiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, JPN.
Takashi MurakamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative lymphatic ascites following lymph node dissection for gynecologic malignancies is not uncommon, although in most cases it resolves spontaneously within two to three weeks, or at most within four months. We present the case of a 73-year-old woman who underwent total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection for endometrial cancer. She subsequently developed a large volume of ascites, which was diagnosed as lymphatic ascites based on biochemical analysis of the ascitic fluid, cytological examination, and CT findings. An initial watchful waiting strategy was ineffective, and at eight months postoperatively, lymphangiography with Lipiodol was performed both for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Although a lymphatic fistula was identified, no therapeutic benefit was achieved, and conservative management was continued. Because the patient exhibited no signs of infection, maintained adequate oral intake, did not require frequent paracentesis or cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART), and was able to receive scheduled adjuvant therapy without delay, invasive surgical intervention was avoided. Ultimately, the ascites resolved spontaneously approximately one year after surgery. Mild lower extremity lymphedema was noted thereafter, but no tumor recurrence was observed. This case demonstrates that even if lymphatic ascites persists for as long as 11 months postoperatively, it may still resolve under extended watchful waiting.

Indexed as

endometrial cancergynecologylymphangiographylymphatic asciteslymphorrheapelvic lymphadenectomypleuroperitoneal communicationpostoperative complicationpostoperative lymphatic leakagewatchful waiting

Identifiers

PMID40062165
PMCPMC11887513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.