Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40062107›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Superior Vena Cava Stenting Complicated by Perforation and Cardiac Tamponade.

Arusa Macnojia, Jacy Gressen, Claudia Wei, Kevin Tzan, Amy Lee, Jamal Hasoon, Giustino Varrassi, Anvinh Nguyen

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arusa MacnojiaAnesthesiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Jacy GressenAnesthesiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Claudia WeiAnesthesiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Kevin TzanAnesthesiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Amy LeeAnesthesiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Jamal HasoonAnesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, UTHealth, McGovern Medical School, Houston, USA.
Giustino VarrassiPain Medicine, Fondazione Paolo Procacci, Rome, ITA.
Anvinh NguyenAnesthesiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is a clinical condition characterized by impaired venous return from the upper body due to intrinsic or extrinsic obstruction of the SVC. Endovascular stenting has become an effective intervention for symptomatic relief. However, the procedure carries a rare risk of life-threatening complications, including SVC perforation and cardiac tamponade. This study describes a 60-year-old male with SVC syndrome secondary to squamous cell carcinoma of the lung who developed SVC perforation and cardiac tamponade during endovascular stenting. Despite initial hemodynamic compromise and cardiac arrest, prompt intervention with pericardiocentesis, aggressive resuscitation, and deployment of a covered stent resulted in a successful outcome within 4 minutes. This report highlights the critical role of anesthetic management in SVC syndrome cases, emphasizing the importance of airway precautions, hemodynamic stability, and access to inferior venous return for large-volume resuscitation. This case underscores the need for vigilance in recognizing and managing SVC stenting complications. Furthermore, it advocates for a multidisciplinary approach involving anesthesiology, interventional radiology, and cardiothoracic surgery to optimize outcomes.

Indexed as

cardiac anesthesiacardiac tamponadecomplicationsendovascular stentingsuperior vena cava syndrome

Identifiers

PMID40062107
PMCPMC11888782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.