ArticleCureus2025
Perspectives and Performance of First-Year Medical and Dental Students in Anatomy Education Through Cadaveric Dissection: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital and immersive approaches to anatomy education: a pilot comparative study of CI, VR, and hybrid learning in implant planning.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- A global overview of anatomical science education and its present and future role in biomedical curricula.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Review
- Effective approaches towards teaching human anatomy among MBBS students in India.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAnatomical education serves as the cornerstone of medical and dental training, and cadaveric dissection is traditionally regarded as the gold standard for teaching human anatomy. This study explored the attitudes and perceptions of first-year Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) and Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) students toward cadaveric dissection and its impact on their academic performance and professional development. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in the Department of Anatomy. A structured questionnaire comprising 10 questions assessed the students' attitudes, perceptions, and preferences toward cadaveric dissection. The sample included 500 first-year MBBS and BDS students from four institutions. Data were collected anonymously using Google Forms and analyzed. Statistical tests, including chi-square and independent t-tests, were used to compare the responses and formative scores between the groups.
resultsA total of 450 medical and dental students responded, with 162 individuals (36.00%) participating in the BDS curriculum focused on anatomical studies, whereas 288 individuals (64.00%) were engaged in the MBBS program, resulting in an impressive response rate of 90%. Among medical students, 105 (36.5%%) were males, and 183 (63.5%) were females. Among dental students, 66 (40.7%) were males, and 96 (59.3%) were females. Dental students exhibited greater empathy and appreciation for cadaveric dissection (p=0.001), potentially related to the practical skills required in dentistry. However, medical students scored significantly higher on cadaveric dissection-based assessments (p<0.001), reflecting their broader and more detailed anatomical curricula. Despite these differences, students across both groups emphasized the importance of cadaveric dissection in developing clinical and professional skills.
conclusionCadaveric dissection remains an indispensable tool in anatomy education, fostering a deep understanding of human anatomy and instilling empathy and professionalism. For perception, dental students significantly favored cadaveric dissection for providing a better learning experience than alternative methods, improving spatial understanding, and aiding clinical correlation understanding. Regarding attitude, dental students more strongly associated cadaveric dissection with respect and dignity, emotional comfort, and influencing attitudes toward life and death. In practice, dental students showed greater agreement that cadaveric dissection should remain integral to education and benefit their future careers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.