Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40062072›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Experiences of COVID-19 Patients With Person-Centred Care During Cohort Isolation: A Mixed-Method Study.

Vera P Van Druten, Andrea D Rozema, Tessel H G Hendriksen, Esther de Vries, Dike van de Mheen, Carolina J P W Keijsers, Babette C van der Zwaard, Aukelien Scheffelaar, Lenny M W Nahar-van Venrooij

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vera P Van DrutenTranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, NLD.
Andrea D RozemaTranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, NLD.
Tessel H G HendriksenDepartment of Medical Psychology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, NLD.
Esther de VriesTranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, NLD.
Dike van de MheenTranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, NLD.
Carolina J P W KeijsersDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, NLD.
Babette C van der ZwaardDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, NLD.
Aukelien ScheffelaarTranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, NLD.
Lenny M W Nahar-van VenrooijJeroen Bosch Academy Research, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, NLD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Quality of care may have been compromised during the exceptionally hectic period of the COVID-19 waves, including isolation precautions. Aims Experiences with person-centred care and wellbeing of COVID-19 patients admitted to a cohort isolation nursing ward during the first pandemic wave were explored, including differences between the acute phase (March 2020) and semi-acute phase (April-June 2020). Methods A convergent parallel mixed-method design was used. Adult no post-ICU patients visiting the outpatient clinic for COVID-19 aftercare between May and September 2020 six to eight weeks after discharge from the COVID-19 hospital ward were asked to participate. Part 1 comprised Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) questionnaires (n=134) and part 2 semi-structured interviews (n=30). Thematic analysis was performed, and themes were linked to the domains of the person-centred care framework. Results Part 1: Median scores on all the questions of the PREM were high. The lowest scores on the PREM questionnaire were seen on shared decision-making during the acute phase. Part 2: In line with this, the interviews also indicated that the majority of patients had positive experiences regarding person-centred care and that patients felt a limited need for interaction in shared decision-making. Additionally, it was learned from the interviews that the domain care environment was affected most by the pandemic: the isolation precautions had an impact on patients' wellbeing, although they understood the necessity for isolation precautions to protect others. Patients felt lonely, missed physical contact with family and friends, and felt that contact with healthcare professionals was influenced by isolation clothes. Although some still felt isolated, the cohort department contributed to a feeling of engagement with other patients having the same illness. Conclusion Delivered care was positively experienced by patients despite the hectic outbreak period. Patients understood and adapted their preferences to the circumstances. However, patients' wellbeing was influenced by the circumstances in which care was received. To improve patients' wellbeing during isolation, recognisability of healthcare workers should be stimulated, visits from family and friends should be allowed, and no use of single-room isolation is advised.

Indexed as

care experiencescohort isolationcovid-19isolation precautionsperson-centred care

Identifiers

PMID40062072
PMCPMC11885181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.