ArticleCureus2025
Laplacian of Gaussian for Fast Cell Detection and Segmentation in Cervical Cytology to Help in Cancer Diagnosis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality among women worldwide, and its early detection is crucial to improve survival rates. While a Pap smear is widely used as a diagnostic tool, it has limitations in sensitivity and specificity due to the inherent subjectivity of cytological analysis. This study proposes a methodology for cervical cell segmentation and extraction based on the Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG) algorithm, which enables the generation of regions of interest to detect and segment cells precisely in cervical cytology samples. Over 2,000 digital images of Pap smear slides were analyzed, derived from 500 cervical cytology slides provided by the State Public Health Laboratory of Michoacán, México. The dataset results demonstrated an accuracy of 96.5%, a recall rate of 99.2%, and an F-measure of 97.8%. Furthermore, the methodology was optimized for real-time analysis, allowing efficient segmentation and detection of cells and their morphological variations. This methodology not only significantly improves accuracy and efficiency in cervical cell segmentation but also has a high potential for application in other experiments that require precise cell segmentation despite morphological variations. In this regard, it offers an adaptable and versatile approach, making a substantial contribution to cytological studies and establishing itself as an effective process to extract cervical cells automatically in real time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.