Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40062056›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Early Detection of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in a Neurosurgical Patient: Do Biomarkers Help Us?

Tobias Bexten, Stefan Wiebe, Melindi Brink, Dominik Hinzmann, Golo-Sung Haarmeyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tobias BextenClinic for Interdisciplinary Intensive Medicine and Intermediate Care, Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, DEU.
Stefan WiebeClinic for Interdisciplinary Intensive Medicine and Intermediate Care, Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, DEU.
Melindi BrinkClinic for Interdisciplinary Intensive Medicine and Intermediate Care, Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, DEU.
Dominik HinzmannClinic for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, DEU.
Golo-Sung HaarmeyerClinic for Internal Intensive Care, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg Hospital, Nuremberg, DEU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains a significant complication in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. It is particularly prevalent in neurosurgical patients, contributing to high morbidity and healthcare costs. Early diagnosis and timely treatment are crucial for preventing the progression of VAP. However, diagnosing VAP remains challenging because no diagnostic tool or biomarker can reliably confirm the condition. Nevertheless, biomarkers remain the most frequently used surrogates for VAP. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) and look at relevant clinical markers for the early detection of VAP. Additionally, the impact of the use of IL-6 or PCT/CRP on clinical decision-making in the diagnosis and management of VAP in neurosurgical patients was explored.

methodsIn this retrospective single-center study, we screened 1,817 neurosurgical intensive care patients between January 2020 and December 2023. In the first step, the ability of IL-6, PCT, and CRP to predict VAP was tested. We distinguished microbiologically confirmed VAP (mcVAP), suspected VAP (suspVAP ), and non-VAP. In the second step, two cohorts were compared: patients monitored with IL-6 alone and those monitored with PCT and CRP. Here, we compared the relevance of these markers for treatment decisions, antibiotic usage, and clinical parameters.

resultsA total of 240 neurosurgical patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria: 155 in the IL-6 group and 85 in the PCT/CRP group. The IL-6 level on the day of mcVAP and suspVAP was 106 pg/mL (IQR: 58.3-259.0) and 112 pg/mL (IQR: 58.3-259), respectively, whereas it was 33.55 ng/L (IQR: 19.6-59.2) in non-VAP patients (p<0.001; η² = 0.14, AUC 0.82 and 0.81, respectively). PCT also showed significant differences, although with a small effect size (η² = 0.008, p = 0.010). For CRP, no significant differences were observed (p = 0.317). In the IL-6 group, the start of treatment did not differ from that in the PCT/CRP group. The duration of antibiotic administration was slightly shorter in the IL-6 group than in the control group, although the differences were not statistically significant (6.25 (±3.73) and 5.9 (±2.23) days versus 7.37 (±4.95) and 7.67 (±2.65) days; p = 0.339 and p = 0.214, respectively).

conclusionWhile PCT has diagnostic value, IL-6 has superior predictive value for VAP, which is reflected in its high effect size and shorter duration of antibiotic treatment, although the difference was not significant. This study suggests that incorporating IL-6 as a routine biomarker may improve the early recognition of VAP, potentially optimizing treatment strategies in the neurosurgical ICU setting. However, the major limitation lies in the study's retrospective design, which limits its generalizability.

Indexed as

interleukin (il)-6neurosurgical intensive care unitprocalcitonin (pct)serum biomarkersventilator-associated pneumonia (vap)

Identifiers

PMID40062056
PMCPMC11888789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.