ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Comparative study of cylindrical
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMagnetic compression anastomosis (MCA) offers a simple and reliable technique for inducing anastomoses at any point along the digestive tract. Evidence regarding whether the design of the MCA device influences the anastomosis effect is lacking.
aimTo investigate any difference in the side-to-side colonic anastomosis effect achieved with cylindrical
methodsWe designed cylindrical and circular ring magnets suitable for side-to-side colonic anastomosis in rats. Thirty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into a cylindrical group, circular ring group, and cylindrical-circular ring group (
resultsIn all 30 rats, side-to-side colonic anastomosis was completed, for an operation success rate of 100%. No postoperative complications of bleeding and intestinal obstruction occurred, and the postoperative survival rate were 100%. The operation time, magnet discharge time, anastomotic bursting pressure, and anastomotic diameter did not differ significantly among the three designs (
conclusionThis study found no significant difference in the establishment of rat side-to-side colonic anastomosis with the use of cylindrical
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.