ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Magnamosis for rectal reconstruction in canines.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe magnamosis, a minimal invasive, suture-free procedure, has been used for digestive tract or vessel reconstruction, such as gastrointestinal anastomosis, bilioenteric anastomosis, and coronary artery bypass. Although some case reports have demonstrated the potential of magnamosis for the treatment of congenital rectal atresia (RA), they cannot provide strong evidence for its widespread application.
aimTo assess the feasibility and safety of magnamosis in treating RA in dogs as compared to suturing anastomosis. The findings of this study can be beneficial in guiding the clinical application of magnamosis.
methodsThirty-six dogs were randomly assigned to the magnamosis group (
resultsThe mean time for rectal anastomosis was significantly shorter in the magnamosis group (12.22 ± 2.78 minutes) than the suturing anastomosis group (18.11 ± 1.68 minutes). There was one incidence of anastomotic bleeding in the suturing anastomosis group, whereas no complication was recorded in the magnamosis group. The magnets were discharged post-surgery in 7.17 ± 1.30 days in all the dogs. The histopathological examination revealed a smoother healing of anastomotic mucosa in the magnamosis group as compared to that in the suturing anastomosis group. Moreover, the fiber alignment was also more natural in the magnamosis group with minimal inflammation.
conclusionRectal reconstruction using magnamosis is a feasible, safe, and effective alternative to suturing anastomosis in dogs, with the added benefit of faster and more natural healing of the anastomosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.