ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Comprehensive influence of individualized nutrition support and nursing strategy on rehabilitation of patients with liver cancer after operation.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global trends and thematic evolution of nursing in liver cancer: a bibliometric analysis of the web of science core collection (1944-2025).Discover oncology · 2026Article
- A structured, indicator-driven quality improvement cycle is associated with improved adherence and outcomes after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Effect of stratified management and stepwise training on pulmonary rehabilitation in older patients with liver cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Analysis of risk factors for elective surgery complications in a cancer specialty hospital based on propensity score matching.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma ranks among the most prevalent malignant neoplasms. Surgical intervention constitutes a critical therapeutic approach for this condition. Nonetheless, postoperative recovery is frequently influenced by the patient's nutritional status and the quality of nursing care provided.
aimTo examine the comprehensive impact of personalized nutritional support and nursing strategies on the postoperative rehabilitation of patients with liver cancer.
methodsIn this study, a retrospective comparative analysis was conducted involving 60 post-operative liver cancer patients. The subjects were selected as subjects and divided into two groups based on differing nursing interventions, with each group comprising 30 patients. The control group received standard nutritional support and care, whereas the experimental group received individualized nutritional support and nursing strategies. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of individualized nutrition by comparing the rehabilitation indices, nutritional status, quality of life (QoL), and complication rates between the two groups.
resultsThe results showed that the recovery index of the experimental group was significantly better than that of the control group 2 weeks after surgery, and the average liver function recovery index of the experimental group was 85. significantly higher than that of the control group (73.67 ± 7.19). In terms of nutritional status, the serum albumin level and body weight stabilization rate of the experimental group were also significantly higher than those of the control group, which were 42.33 ± 2.4 g/L and 93.3%, respectively, compared with 36.01 ± 3.85 g/L and 76.7% of the control group. In addition, the average QoL score of the experimental group was 84.66 ± 3.7 points, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (70.92 ± 4.28 points). At the psychological level, the average anxiety score of the experimental group was 1.17 ± 0.29, and the average depression score was 1.47 ± 0.4, which were significantly lower than the 2.26 ± 0.42 and 2.57 ± 0.45 of the control group. This showed that patients in the experimental group were better relieved of anxiety and depression under the individualized nutrition support and nursing strategy. More importantly, the complication rate in the experimental group was only 10%, much lower than the 33.3% in the control group.
conclusionPersonalized nutritional support and tailored nursing strategies significantly enhance the postoperative rehabilitation of liver cancer patients. Consequently, it is recommended to implement and advocate for these individualized approaches to improve both the recovery outcomes and QoL for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.