ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Adverse drug reactions to atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: an analysis of the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system database.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stratified Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Could Potentially Improve the Efficacy and Safety of Oxcarbazepine in Children with Epilepsy: Novel Insights from a Single-Center, Large-Sample, Retrospective Real-World Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of the study is to systematically identify and evaluate the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with the combination therapy of systematically and bevacizumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and methods: Data were extracted from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. Disproportionality analysis was conducted using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) of information components (IC). Time-to-onset (TTO) profiles were analyzed using the Weibull shape parameter (WSP) test, while cumulative incidences were assessed using the Kaplan‒Meier method. Valuable preferred term (PT) signals were identified for designated medical event (DME) screening, comparing these signals with system organ class (SOC) analysis. Results: A total of 2,831 adverse events (AEs) reports were identified in the FAERS database, of which 124 positive AEs were detected across multiple SOCs. The median TTO of AEs was 43 days, with the highest proportion occurring within 0-30 days of TTO (n = 450, 41.17%). The WSP test indicated that patients with abnormal hepatic function and hepatic failure exhibited early failure-type profiles. Ten PT signals consistent with those on the DME list were identified, involving six SOCs. Conclusion: Our study provides valuable pharmacological insights for early clinical intervention in managing ADRs and offers significant clinical benefits for HCC patients undergoing combination therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.