ArticleHeliyon2025
Ergonomic risk assessment in construction: Case study Ecuador.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sagittal Posture Parameters of the Spine and Exposure to Awkward Postures in Mattress Manufacture Workers: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ergonomic risks are a global problem in construction, with health effects that have an impact on the economy. Risk assessment allows companies to identify the risks and the exposure levels to which the workers are subjected and allows to define management plans to address them. However, studies to assess risk levels through new techniques are very scarce in construction. This study aims to evaluate ergonomic risks in construction workers using Ergo/IBV (software for the assessment of ergonomic risks and design recommendations) by the observational REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) method. Data were collected from 14 public sector building projects from May to November 2023. Thirty-two construction finishing activities were identified. Through the stratified method, the five most frequently executed activities were selected: interior and exterior painting, floor ceramics, wall plastering, ceiling and wall plastering. This made it possible to evaluate the ergonomic risk in 94 workers. The evaluation shows that 40 % of the workers were exposed to a high-risk level in the trunk, 2 % in the legs, 20 % in the right arm, and 22 % in the left arm. In short, the five activities adopt forced postures, with REBA scores: medium, high and very high, with high risk level being the most relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.