Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40061922›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Ergonomic risk assessment in construction: Case study Ecuador.

Oswaldo Tandazo, Victoria Jaramillo-Carrión, Eduardo Valarezo, Mercedes Sanchís-Almenara, Laura Montalbán-Domingo, Joaquín Catalá-Alís

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Oswaldo TandazoDepartamento de Producción, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja 1101608, Ecuador.
Victoria Jaramillo-CarriónDepartamento de Producción, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja 1101608, Ecuador.
Eduardo ValarezoDepartamento de Química, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja 1101608, Ecuador.
Mercedes Sanchís-AlmenaraInstituto de Biomecánica de Valencia, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Laura Montalbán-DomingoSchool of Civil Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Joaquín Catalá-AlísSchool of Civil Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ergonomic risks are a global problem in construction, with health effects that have an impact on the economy. Risk assessment allows companies to identify the risks and the exposure levels to which the workers are subjected and allows to define management plans to address them. However, studies to assess risk levels through new techniques are very scarce in construction. This study aims to evaluate ergonomic risks in construction workers using Ergo/IBV (software for the assessment of ergonomic risks and design recommendations) by the observational REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) method. Data were collected from 14 public sector building projects from May to November 2023. Thirty-two construction finishing activities were identified. Through the stratified method, the five most frequently executed activities were selected: interior and exterior painting, floor ceramics, wall plastering, ceiling and wall plastering. This made it possible to evaluate the ergonomic risk in 94 workers. The evaluation shows that 40 % of the workers were exposed to a high-risk level in the trunk, 2 % in the legs, 20 % in the right arm, and 22 % in the left arm. In short, the five activities adopt forced postures, with REBA scores: medium, high and very high, with high risk level being the most relevant.

Indexed as

Ergo/IBVInadequate posturesIncorrect posturesREBA method

Identifiers

PMID40061922
PMCPMC11889554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.