ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2025
Competition Between Protein and DNA for Binding to Natural Sepiolite Nanofibers.
Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sepiolite nanofibers, which are natural silicates belonging to the clay mineral family, could be promising potential nanocarriers for the nonviral transfer of biomolecules. The physicochemical characteristics of sepiolite make it capable of binding various types of biological molecules, including polysaccharides, lipids, proteins and viruses. Sepiolite nanofibers have also been shown to bind effectively to various types of DNA molecules through electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonds, cationic bridges and van der Waals forces. In this study, we analyzed the adsorption of DNA and proteins to sepiolite by analyzing the competition among these biomolecules during the adsorption process. Methods: To determine the binding of sepiolite to proteins, we used BSA and a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against the CD4 membrane antigen as a model. The binding efficiency was measured by adsorption isotherms. Zeta potential measurements of the suspensions were performed using a Brookhaven NanoBrook 90 Plus PALS instrument. Results: We show here that the adsorption of proteins to sepiolite is increased in the presence of CaCl Conclusion: Although various types of protein interactions with mineral clays have been described, our results confirm that electrostatic forces are among the primary interactions in the adsorption process. These results pave the way for the use of biohybrids as a new class of nanoplatform for gene transfer with potential clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.