ArticleBioinformatics advances2025
XeroGraph: enhancing data integrity in the presence of missing values with statistical and predictive analysis.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Missing data present a pervasive challenge in data analysis, potentially biasing outcomes and undermining conclusions if not addressed properly. Missing data are commonly classified into Missing Completely at Random (MCAR), Missing at Random (MAR), and Missing Not at Random (MNAR). While MCAR poses a minimal risk of data distortion, both MAR and MNAR can seriously affect the results of subsequent analyses. Therefore, it is important to know the type of missing data and appropriately handle them. Results: To facilitate efficient handling of missing data, we introduce a Python package named XeroGraph that is designed to evaluate data quality, categorize the nature of missingness, and guide imputation decisions. By comparing how various imputation methods influence underlying distributions, XeroGraph provides a systematic framework that supports more accurate and transparent analyses. Through its comprehensive preliminary assessments and user-friendly interface, this package facilitates the selection of optimal strategies tailored to the specific missing data mechanisms present in a dataset. In doing so, XeroGraph may significantly improve the validity and reproducibility of research findings, making it a valuable tool for professionals in data-intensive fields. Availability and implementation: XeroGraph is compatible with all operating systems and requires Python version 3.9 or higher. It can be freely downloaded from PyPI (https://pypi.org/project/XeroGraph). The source code is accessible on GitHub (https://github.com/kazilab/XeroGraph), and comprehensive documentation is available at Read the Docs (https://xerograph.readthedocs.io). This software is distributed under the Apache License 2.0.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.