ArticleAfrican journal of laboratory medicine2025
Comparison of chromogenic and cysteine lactose electrolyte deficient agar for identification of uropathogens in Gujarat, India.
Article in African journal of laboratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical and Genomic Characterization of High-Risk Multidrug-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are prevalent bacterial infections, necessitating rapid and accurate diagnosis for timely treatment. Conventional culture techniques, such as cystine lactose electrolyte deficient (CLED) agar, can delay treatment and contribute to inappropriate antibiotic use. Not much is known about alternatives such as chromogenic UTI agar. Objective: The study aimed to assess the performance of chromogenic UTI agar compared to conventional methods for identifying uropathogens, especially in polymicrobial infections, and to determine its sensitivity, specificity, time efficiency, and cost-effectiveness for UTI diagnosis. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2024 to June 2024 in the Microbiology Department of M.P. Shah Government Medical College in Jamnagar, Gujarat, India. Urine samples from patients with suspected UTIs ( Results: Chromogenic UTI agar detected single bacterial growth in 63/250 (25.2%) samples, and mixed bacterial growth in 24/250 (9.6%) samples, whereas CLED agar showed single bacterial growth in 67/250 (26.8%) samples and mixed bacterial growth in 10/250 (4%). The chromogenic medium provided preliminary results 5.5 h earlier ( Conclusion: Chromogenic UTI agar demonstrated excellent performance in the rapid and accurate diagnosis of UTIs, including improved detection of polymicrobial infections. What this study adds: When it comes to diagnosing UTIs, chromogenic UTI agar has several benefits over traditional techniques, such as high accuracy, enhanced detection of polymicrobial infections, and cost-effectiveness. The research backs up the inclusion of chromogenic medium in standard UTI diagnosis procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.