ArticleAfrican journal of laboratory medicine2025
Impact of viral load on sample pooling for reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction detection-based diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 in Nigeria.
Article in African journal of laboratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rapid molecular detection ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic strained diagnostic testing capacities globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries like Nigeria. Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) remains the gold standard for COVID-19 detection, but limited testing resources caused bottlenecks in Nigeria's response during the pandemic. Sample pooling offers a cost-effective strategy to enhance testing capacity during future outbreaks. Objective: This study determined the maximum number of COVID-19 samples that can be pooled for RT-PCR testing in Nigeria without compromising the detection sensitivity of a single positive sample. Methods: A total of 1222 nasopharyngeal samples from symptomatic COVID-19 patients in Nasarawa State, Nigeria, collected between March 2021 and August 2022, were retrieved from the laboratory biorepository and analysed from November 2022 to February 2023. These included five positive samples with cycle threshold (Ct) values ranging from ≤ 20 to 40, and 1217 negative samples. Positive samples were pooled with negative ones at increasing dilution ratios (1:4-1:64), to assess detection sensitivity on the GeneXpert platform. Results: A positive sample with a Ct value ≤ 25 could be pooled with up to 64 negative samples while maintaining a detectable positive result. However, samples with Ct values of 36-40 could only be pooled with a maximum of eight negative samples. Higher Ct values reduced pooling effectiveness. Conclusion: Sample pooling is a feasible method for scaling up COVID-19 RT-PCR testing in resource-limited settings like Nigeria. The Ct value is critical in determining optimal pool sizes for accurate detection. What this study adds: The findings provide critical guidelines for determining the optimal pool sizes based on Ct values, aiding in effective COVID-19 testing strategies. By optimising sample pooling based on viral load, health authorities can improve their response to future COVID-19 outbreaks and similar public health emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.