ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Evaluation of Surface Treatments on the Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin and RMGIC to Biodentine: An
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate and contrast the impact of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of composite resin and RMGIC on Biodentine. Materials and Methods: Sixty acrylic blocks with 4mm diameter and 2mm depth central cavities were made, and Biodentine (Septodont, France) was filled into the cavities and sorted into three groups (n = 20) based on the different surface treatments on Biodentine. The SBS was evaluated by employing a knife-edge blade in a universal testing machine, and fractured surfaces were analyzed under a Scanning electron microscope. Results: The study results indicated that the use of 9% hydrofluoric acid etching with Biodentine resulted in significantly greater SBS compared to the other groups, namely 37% phosphoric acid etching with Biodentine and intraoral sandblasting with Biodentine. Conclusion: 9% hydrofluoric acid etching was the preferred choice of surface treatment on Biodentine in vital pulp therapy and composite resin showed better SBS with Biodentine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.