ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Effect of Micro Osteoperforation with Mini Implant on Rate of Tooth Movement During Maxillary Arch En-Masse Retraction in Class I Malocclusion Cases-A Split Mouth Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Extended orthodontic treatment leads to a number of negative outcomes, including a higher chance of dental cavities, gingival recession, open gingival embrasure gaps, and root resorption. It has been stated that micro osteoperforations (MOPs) use the biology of the body to speed up tooth movement. Our objective was to investigate how MOPs with micro implants affected the tooth movement rate. Methods: A parallel arm clinical trial at Noorul Islam College of Dental Sciences involved 36 maxillary quadrants from 18 patients aged 14-20 with class I malocclusion requiring maxillary first premolar extraction. The left quadrant served as a control, and the right as the experimental side. Following alignment with the MBT bracket system, MOPs with mini implants were conducted on the experimental side before retraction. This process was repeated every 28 days for three months. Tooth movement on both sides was measured and analyzed using SPSS 26.0. Result: The rate of retraction did not differ statistically significantly between the experimental and control groups. In the experimental group, the mean rate of retraction was 5.77 ± 0.71 mm, while in the control group, it was 5.71 ± 0.73 mm. Conclusion: Micro osteoperforations (MOPs) used in the study didn't facilitate an enhanced retraction rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.